gen‑ai.news
← Back
Image

Midjourney is Trying to Force Hollywood to Reveal How it Uses AI

Midjourney, the generative image company known for its text-to-image model, is taking an aggressive legal stance against Hollywood studios - seeking to force them to disclose the extent to which they use AI tools in film and television production. The move comes as Midjourney itself faces ongoing litigation from artists and rights holders over the use of copyrighted works in training its models, making the disclosure push a notable counter-offensive in what has become a broader legal and cultural conflict over AI.

At the heart of Midjourney's argument is a claim of hypocrisy. Major studios have publicly positioned themselves as protectors of human creative labor, backing union efforts to restrict AI use and criticizing AI companies for alleged copyright violations. Midjourney appears to be arguing that studios are simultaneously using generative AI tools internally, and that surfacing this information is relevant to the legal proceedings it is involved in.

The tactic reflects a common litigation strategy: using the discovery process to surface information that could undermine an opponent's credibility or weaken their legal standing. If studios are shown to rely on AI-generated imagery, effects work, or other outputs from tools similar to those they oppose in court, it could complicate their narrative and potentially affect how courts weigh their arguments. It also raises a genuine question about where the line is drawn between acceptable and unacceptable AI use in a commercial context.

The broader context here matters. Hollywood unions, particularly SAG-AFTRA and the WGA, negotiated hard-won contract provisions around AI use following strikes in 2023. Studios agreed to certain restrictions and disclosure requirements with their own workers, but those agreements are separate from what Midjourney is seeking through the courts. How much AI quietly flows through production pipelines - in pre-visualization, background generation, concept art, or post-production - remains largely opaque to the public. Whether Midjourney succeeds in pulling back that curtain or not, the attempt itself highlights a tension that the industry has yet to resolve honestly.

Read at PetaPixel →
Share:X

Enjoy this story? Get the next one in your inbox.

Twice a week: the most important stories in generative image and video AI, distilled into a 2-minute read.

Free. Unsubscribe any time. No spam, ever.

Your next read

Image

ByteDance debuts Seedream 5.0 Pro with advanced reasoning

ByteDance has introduced Seedream 5.0 Pro, its latest multimodal image generation model, bringing advanced reasoning capabilities alongside precise editing tools and multilingual support. The release marks a notable step forward in ByteDance's push into generative image AI. It positions Seedream as a more capable and flexible option for a range of creative and practical use cases.

No image
Image

Google’s deepfake detector system used to debunk McConnell hoax pic

A photograph appearing to show Kentucky Senator Mitch McConnell in severe medical distress circulated widely this week before being identified as AI-generated. Google's deepfake detection system played a central role in debunking the image, marking a notable real-world application of the technology.

Image

6 Best Image Upscalers Tested: Photo Upscaling Without the Plastic Look

AI-powered image upscalers have matured to the point where enlarging a photo to 4K or 8K is largely a solved problem - the harder question now is whether the output still looks like a photograph. PetaPixel tested six leading tools to find out which ones preserve natural texture and which ones produce the telltale over-smoothed, plastic appearance. The results offer a practical guide for photographers choosing an upscaling workflow.