gen‑ai.news
← Back
Image

Adobe Adds More User Control to AI Features Inside Lightroom and Photoshop

Adobe Adds More User Control to AI Features Inside Lightroom and Photoshop

Adobe has updated its Creative Cloud suite with new AI-related controls in Lightroom and Photoshop, focusing on the parts of a photographer's workflow that tend to consume the most time - sorting and selecting images from large shoots. The company is framing the updates around a familiar pain point: spending hours reviewing thousands of frames from events or portrait sessions to find the images worth delivering to clients.

The core of the Lightroom changes appears to center on AI-powered photo culling, where the software can analyze a shoot and surface likely selects based on factors such as sharpness, exposure, and subject expression. Rather than simply automating that process invisibly, Adobe's newer approach emphasizes giving users the ability to adjust how the AI weighs different criteria, so the results align more closely with an individual photographer's preferences and style.

On the Photoshop side, the updates continue a broader trend of integrating generative and intelligent tools - such as Generative Fill and AI-based masking - with more explicit user-facing controls. This matters because photographers and retouchers have increasingly asked for clearer feedback on what the AI is doing and more ways to constrain or guide its output, rather than accepting a single result. Greater transparency in these tools helps professionals maintain a consistent creative vision while still benefiting from automated assistance.

Adobe has been steadily threading AI capabilities into its creative applications over the past few years, leaning on its Firefly model for generative features while keeping other AI functions - like subject selection and sky replacement - built on separate, longer-standing technology. The latest round of updates suggests the company is paying attention to feedback that more automation does not always mean a better experience, and that giving users meaningful control is just as important as the underlying capability itself.

Read at PetaPixel →
Share:X

Enjoy this story? Get the next one in your inbox.

Twice a week: the most important stories in generative image and video AI, distilled into a 2-minute read.

Free. Unsubscribe any time. No spam, ever.

Your next read

Car Photography Company Sues Midjourney for Allegedly Copying Thousands of Its Photos
Image

Car Photography Company Sues Midjourney for Allegedly Copying Thousands of Its Photos

A car photography company has filed a lawsuit against Midjourney, alleging the AI image generator used tens of thousands of its copyrighted vehicle photos as training data without authorization. The case adds to a growing body of copyright litigation targeting generative AI companies over their use of unlicensed visual material. It is one of the more focused suits in the space, centering on a single industry's photographic catalog rather than a broad coalition of creators.

Court Rejects xAI Bid to Block Minnesota Law Targeting AI 'Nudify' Apps
Image

Court Rejects xAI Bid to Block Minnesota Law Targeting AI 'Nudify' Apps

A federal judge has declined xAI's request for a preliminary injunction to stop a Minnesota law banning AI-powered 'nudify' applications from taking effect. The ruling allows the state's restrictions on non-consensual AI-generated intimate imagery to stand while litigation continues.

xAI Fails to Block Minnesota Law Targeting AI Nudification Apps
Image

xAI Fails to Block Minnesota Law Targeting AI Nudification Apps

A federal judge has denied xAI's request for a preliminary injunction against a Minnesota law banning apps that generate non-consensual intimate imagery. The ruling allows the law to take effect while xAI's broader legal challenge continues.