gen‑ai.news
← Back
Image

Apple and Google ordered by San Francisco attorney to take action against 'nudify' apps

Apple and Google ordered by San Francisco attorney to take action against 'nudify' apps

San Francisco City Attorney David Chiu has issued cease-and-desist letters to both Apple and Google, directing them to take action against 13 "nudify" applications listed on the App Store and Google Play. The apps in question use generative AI models to synthetically remove clothing from photos of real individuals - producing non-consensual intimate imagery, commonly referred to as NCII. The letters demand that the companies remove the apps from their storefronts and take steps to prevent similar tools from appearing in the future.

Nudify apps have proliferated alongside advances in image generation technology, and they have been a persistent concern for legislators, platform operators, and advocacy groups. The underlying models are typically trained on large datasets of real images and can produce convincing results from a single photograph. Victims are often women and minors, and the imagery is frequently used for harassment or extortion.

Both Apple and Google maintain developer policies that prohibit apps facilitating the creation of sexualized imagery of real people without consent, but enforcement has been inconsistent. Critics have argued that the app review processes at both companies have allowed tools with clearly harmful use cases to slip through, sometimes by framing their functionality ambiguously in store listings. The city attorney's action essentially puts both platforms on notice that local authorities are willing to pursue legal pressure where internal moderation has fallen short.

This development fits into a broader pattern of regulatory and legal attention on generative AI misuse. The federal DEFIANCE Act, signed into law in 2024, created a civil right of action for victims of AI-generated NCII, and several states have passed or are considering their own criminal statutes. A formal demand from a city attorney does not carry the same weight as legislation, but it signals that platform accountability for AI-enabled harm is becoming an active front for legal authorities at multiple levels of government.

Read at Engadget →
Share:X

Enjoy this story? Get the next one in your inbox.

Twice a week: the most important stories in generative image and video AI, distilled into a 2-minute read.

Free. Unsubscribe any time. No spam, ever.

Your next read

xAI Fails to Block Minnesota Law Targeting AI Nudification Apps
Image

xAI Fails to Block Minnesota Law Targeting AI Nudification Apps

A federal judge has denied xAI's request for a preliminary injunction against a Minnesota law banning apps that generate non-consensual intimate imagery. The ruling allows the law to take effect while xAI's broader legal challenge continues.

Photography Gallery’s Decision to Exhibit AI Images Sparks Anger
Image

Photography Gallery’s Decision to Exhibit AI Images Sparks Anger

A Belfast photography gallery has drawn criticism from photographers and the wider arts community after hosting an exhibition that included AI-generated images alongside traditional photographic work. The decision has reignited longstanding debates about whether AI-generated imagery belongs in spaces dedicated to photography. Critics argue that exhibiting such work under a photography banner misrepresents the medium and devalues the craft of working photographers.

Google Earth Pulls AI Image Generator After Users Created Misleading Images
Image

Google Earth Pulls AI Image Generator After Users Created Misleading Images

Google Earth quietly removed its newly integrated Nano Banana AI image generator just days after launch, following reports that users were producing misleading images with the tool. The feature had only just been covered in the press when Google moved to pull it, suggesting the decision was a rapid response to early misuse.