gen‑ai.news
← Back
Video

Snap and LinkedIn are fighting back against a flood of low-quality AI content

Snap and LinkedIn are fighting back against a flood of low-quality AI content

As generative AI tools become easier to use, social platforms are grappling with an influx of low-quality, algorithmically produced content that can crowd out more substantive posts. Two major platforms - Snap and LinkedIn - have now moved to address the problem in different ways, signaling that content moderation policies are starting to catch up with the pace of AI adoption.

Snap has announced a ban on AI-generated videos in Spotlight, its short-form video feed designed to surface content from across the Snapchat community. The policy draws a clear line: videos produced externally by AI tools are not welcome, but content that has been edited or enhanced using Snapchat's own built-in AI features is still permitted. This distinction suggests Snap is less concerned with AI involvement per se and more focused on preserving the sense that Spotlight reflects genuine human expression and creativity.

LinkedIn has taken a different approach. Rather than outright restricting AI-generated posts, the Microsoft-owned professional network has added a dedicated reporting button that allows users to flag content they consider low-quality AI output. The feature gives the community a more direct role in surfacing problematic content, and puts a label on a phenomenon - often called "AI slop" - that has become a persistent complaint among users frustrated by hollow, engagement-baiting posts written or generated with minimal human input.

Both moves point to a broader tension that platforms will likely be managing for some time. Generative AI lowers the cost of producing content dramatically, which can be useful for legitimate creators but also makes it trivial to flood feeds with filler. By carving out policies that distinguish between quality-conscious AI use and indiscriminate AI output, Snap and LinkedIn are attempting to keep their feeds useful without banning AI tools altogether - a balance that will require ongoing adjustment as the technology continues to develop.

Enjoy this story? Get the next one in your inbox.

Twice a week: the most important stories in generative image and video AI, distilled into a 2-minute read.

Free. Unsubscribe any time. No spam, ever.

Your next read

Video

Best AI Video Generation Models in 2026: Elo, Price per Second, Open Weights

The AI video generation landscape has shifted considerably over the past year, with native audio, longer clip lengths, and open-weights models now firmly part of the competitive field. A November 2026 ranking from Artificial Analysis's blind human-preference Elo arena pairs quality scores with API pricing to give a clearer picture of where each model stands. The result is a leaderboard that looks notably different from what it did in late 2025.

5 new Google Flow Tools designed by visual artists
Video

5 new Google Flow Tools designed by visual artists

Google has added five new tools to Flow, its AI-powered filmmaking platform, developed with input from working filmmakers and visual artists. The additions are aimed at giving creators more precise control over how their stories are visualized and produced. Each tool addresses a specific stage or challenge in the visual storytelling process.

Runway News | Closing the Gap Between Policy and Practice
Video

Runway News | Closing the Gap Between Policy and Practice

Runway has updated its content moderation policies to permit a broader range of dramatic and genre fiction content - including sword fights, shootouts, and horror - while keeping firm limits around genuine harm. The changes reflect an effort to bring the platform's written rules closer in line with what its systems actually allow in practice. Users can also now flag cases where moderation gets it wrong.